![iridient x-transformer vs sylk iridient x-transformer vs sylk](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552/0923/0485/t/4/assets/ManisIteritasMagnus2_small.png)
- IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK UPDATE
- IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK MANUAL
- IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK FULL
- IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK SOFTWARE
While they aren't the last word in depth rendition, they do a better job than the AF-S lenses of their respective focal length. I've decided to go back to my work requirements and found modern lenses that displayed the best balance of correction and 3d pop. I also feel much lighter doing so since it's easier to decide what goes in the bag when you narrow down the choices.
IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK MANUAL
Also, many of them were of manual focus (yes, my zeiss 85mm 1.4 is gone.) and while I'd love to find myself a lovely fullframe mirrorless camera to adapt them on it for some sheer fun, life just doesn't give me that time to spend on such interests. I spoke about them in the AF-S G prime article but a lot has to do with fringing and chromatic aberration rendition as well as strong distracting bokeh outlining. While I would like to take the time to appreciate the little improvements and subtleties of a lens' ability to display 3d pop, there's no denying that most of them come with dealbreakers. On images taken at ISO 12800 the original Fuji X-T2 RAW files have that lovely fine grainy noise but the DNG files have changed this to what is best described as a. After it processes your image, it plonks a DNG file into your filmstrip, next to your existing file.In professional photography, the lenses that bring home money are usually the best lenses overall. Hi Robin, I have Iridient X- Transformer on trial at the moment but I am disappointed with the initial results comparing the original RAW file with the new DNG file in Lightroom. As LR is at pains to point out to the user at every step, Enhance Details is “ COMPUTATIONALLY INTENSIVE” and works best with a beefy GPU. It works with all standard Bayer raw files (from almost every other manufacturer) and, importantly, raw files from X-Trans sensors. Instead “Enhance Details” harnesses the powers of machine learning to improve details and reduce artifacts in images. Track 45 right.”īut no, apparently this isn’t Adobe’s goal…yet. Download the free demo of X-Transformer 1.6.8 for Fujifilm RAF here.
![iridient x-transformer vs sylk iridient x-transformer vs sylk](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MtYYHgdXsKM/maxresdefault.jpg)
New RAW camera support includes: Fujifilm: X-S10.
IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK UPDATE
At first I thought all my Blade Runner/ CSI fantasises were coming true - my very own ESPER machine! I could FINALLY understand how Deckard found Zhora in a scanned photograph using the completely sensible voice commands of: “Enhance 224 to 176. The Iridient X-Transformer 1.6.8 update is now available This update brings new RAW camera support, performance improvements and bug fixes.
IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK FULL
Click on the image to see the full detailīut Adobe released a new version of Lightroom “Classic” CC recently which includes a curiously named feature - Enhance Details.
IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SYLK SOFTWARE
Iridient’s software deals with small details and foliage particularly well (see below).ġ00% of a grille - (L) Iridient (R) Lightroom native. LR’s processing is good enough most of the time, but for critical work, I use a standalone processor - Iridient X-Transformer - to convert the RAF into DNG and go from there. I’m an Adobe Lightroom user (the real Lightroom, not the cloud-based experimental toy thing that’s now called “Lightroom CC”) and have seen X-Trans RAF support go from “oh my god that is terrible is there something wrong with the camera?” to “this is pretty…pretty good”. This leaves Fuji X shooters getting great JPEGs from the camera, but with a RAF raw file that simply can’t match the proprietary processing. Images from X-Trans sensors had a bit of a reputation for looking like smeary, mottled, oil-painting like shit in certain circumstances. It’s everything I could possibly want from a digital camera, but its “revolutionary” X-Trans sensor can often leave a bit to be desired when paired with a third-party raw processor.
![iridient x-transformer vs sylk iridient x-transformer vs sylk](https://i.imgur.com/VFgjedR.gif)
If you’re a Fujifilm X shooter, you might have a bit of a love-hate relationship with your camera.